In this episode, I read my short paper with Morgan Thompson in WIRES Cognitive Science titled, “Testing for Implicit Bias: Values, Psychometrics, and Science Communication“. You may have heard about implicit bias. It is measured by indirect rather than direct measures of bias. We reconstruct arguments from debates about these measures, reveal some instances of talking past one another, highlight how debate has changed, and highlight how the debate is laden with value judgments about psychometrics and science communication. As always, free preprints of my papers are available on my CV under “Publications”.
This podcast is sponsored by Homer. Homer is a learning program for kids delivered through devices like tablets. It covers reading, math, creativity, critical thinking, and even socio-emotional learning. Try a free trial or just learn more at the link in the podcast description (homer.i8epma.net/byrd).
You can find the Upon Reflection podcast here or in your podcast app. You can also find out more about me and my research on Twitter via @byrd_nick, or on Facebook via @byrdnick. If you end up enjoying the Upon Reflection podcast, then feel free to tell people about it, online, in person, or in your ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ review.
Related posts
- Upon Reflection Podcast Ep. 1: What We Can Infer About Implicit Bias
- Implicit Bias & Philosophy
- Debiasing in Administration, Advising, & Teaching
- Implicit Bias | Part 3: Workplace Bias
- Implicit Bias | Part 4: Ten Debiasing Strategies
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 23:05 — 42.3MB)
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | TuneIn | RSS | More
Thanks, Nick! I don’t have access to equipment to obtain a readable copy of your paper. I think I understand implicit bias though. One of my sources has devoted time and blog space to discussion of microaggressions. These seem to me to represent one kind of implicit bias, unless my understanding is all wrong. Keep up the good work!