In this episode, I read one of my 2022 articles in Metaphilosophy titled, “Bounded Reflectivism & Epistemic Identity“. Does reflective reasoning help or hinder our judgment? In this paper, I take a middle view between reflectivism and anti-reflectivism that I call bounded reflectivism. The idea is that reflection is a tool that can be used to improve our judgment or for other purposes (such as to defend the beliefs that we consider essential to our identity—a.k.a., our “epistemic identity”).
As with all of my writing, a free preprint can be found on my CV at byrdnick.com/cv under “Publications“.
This podcast was sponsored by Paying Green’s Carbon Easy. Carbon Easy™ makes it easy for small and medium-sized businesses worldwide to reduce their carbon footprint in a measurable and publicly recognizable way. Find out how your company can meet its carbon goals at carboneasy.sjv.io/byrd.
You can find the Upon Reflection podcast here or in your podcast app. You can also find out more about me and my research on Twitter via @byrd_nick, or on Facebook via @byrdnick. If you end up enjoying the Upon Reflection podcast, then feel free to tell people about it, online, in person, or in your ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ review.
Related posts
- What Is Reflective Reasoning?
- What good is reflective reasoning?
- On Whether Reflection Is A Skill
- On Whether Reflection Is A Virtue
- Upon Reflection Podcast, Ep. 8: Reflective Reasoning & Philosophy
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 40:55 — 74.9MB)
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | TuneIn | RSS | More
